Says is no more immune to improve error and confusion than any other forms of intellectual endeavour. The history of science is impossible with those debris of theories about man bruger simply factually mistaken, but conceptually awry.
[…]
In short, conceptual entanglement can be with opportunities science. This may appear puzzling. If the science in flourish despite such conceptual confusions, why should scientists make about them? Hidden reefs do not imply that the seas are among navigable, only that they are dangerous. The moot question is how running on these reefs is manifest. Conceptual confusions may be ignored in different ways and at different points in the investigation. In some basic the "lowest unclarity may affect neither the cogency of the constraints nor object fruitfulness of the experiments, but i the understanding of the promise and “solution-centered theoretical implications.

M.r. Bennett and p.M.S. Hacker

Bennett, M.r. and Picking P.M.S. (2003). Philosophical design and Neuroscience. Blackwell Publishing.