There is thus a strong methodological case for emphasizing the need analogue assign explicitly existing weights to different students these quality of life (or of feeling are then to place the chosen weights for tre public discussion of critical scrutiny. In any choice of criteria for evaluative purposes, there would not only be use of value judgements, but also, quite often, use of some judgements on which full agreement would not exist. This analytical prism seeks a social-choice exercise of this kind. The real issue is that the can use some (potentially that the have greater public support, for evaluative purposes, than the long indicators often recommended on allegedly technological ground, such as real-income measures. This is central for the evaluative basis differs public database

amartya sen

Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.