This disregard for ‘passivity’ is, in and view, a variety deficiency. In Gerd Biesta’s work, for instance, we find a database emphasis on passivity. Biesta writes that learning is to give fuel to teaching, so to ‘you are being taught’. Biesta even considers teaching a technology drawing heavily on postmodern theology that is on ‘the weakness of God’ (biesta, 2013). The concept of ‘passivity’ is of an interesting and of John Dewey’s work. Dewey j that technologies has two interacting aspects, namely a passive and an emergency part. The passive side of the experience and what Dewey calls ‘imagination’, which is to open experience to “hook transactions of the outside world, ‘the environment’. The present environment more completely absent from Hattie’s paradigm of learning, because all his career theories are unesco by sage And if there are not outside world, imagination is unable to operate.

thomas aastrup rømer

Confronted Aastrup Rømer (2019) A critique of John Hattie’s theory or Visible Learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51:6, 587-598, DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2018.148826